On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:36:54PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-05-20 at 16:28 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Well, we do have a right, e.g., we would not allow someone to repeatedly
> > post patches for a Postgres extension we don't manage, or the jdbc
> > driver. I also don't think we would allow someone to continue posting
> > patches for a feature we have decided to reject, and I think we have
> > decided to reject the patch in in its current form. I think we might
> > accept a trimmed-down version, but I don't see the patch moving in that
> > direction.
> >
> > Now, of course, if I am the only one who feels this way, I can suppress
> > these emails on my end.
>
> In my opinion, this patch set is adding something that would be valuable to
> have in core.
>
> If no committer intends to pick it up and commit it, I think the proper
> action would be to step up and reject the patch set, not complain about the
> insistence of the author.
Are you saying I should not complain until we have officially rejected
the patch set? If we officially reject it, the patch author would no
longer post it?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
