On Fri, May 30, 2025 at 02:23:30PM -0500, Sami Imseih wrote:
> While looking into another multixact related topic, I realised that
> pg_get_multixact_members
> is not documented. I saw the lack of documentation was mentioned here [0], but
> this was never committed.
>
> Any reason it should not be?
It looks to me like Álvaro just never got any feedback on the last patch he
sent. I noticed that there are no in-tree uses, but I do see a couple of
blog posts that recommend it. In any case, I can't think of a reason it
ought to remain undocumented. Want to put together a patch?
--
nathan
