Re: Retiring some encodings? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ken Marshall
Subject Re: Retiring some encodings?
Date
Msg-id aEG0cmEzJxLnbsRT@customer.dllstxx1.pop.starlinkisp.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Retiring some encodings?  (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 03:35:19PM +0200, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Michael Paquier
> > On Mon, May 26, 2025 at 06:54:49PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> > > Agreed, it seems very unappealing to remove something so important to such a
> > > large userbase.
> > 
> > Agreed that the so-said "state" level requirement would be a
> > non-starter.
> 
> Or maybe support for using these as server encodings could be
> removed, keeping the client_encoding part intact?
> 
> Christoph
> 

Hi,

Doesn't the ICU system support this encoding? They could just use it if
you still want to remove our own implementation.

Regards,
Ken



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Wrong security context for deferred triggers?
Next
From: jian he
Date:
Subject: Re: pg18: Virtual generated columns are not (yet) safe when superuser selects from them