Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Nathan Bossart
Subject Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
Date
Msg-id aEH4XYwrlyvjZUvE@nathan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 01:57:30PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> How does the RMT feel about this change?  Nathan, would you be OK with
> that?  It's not a big problem, as well, if the code is kept as-is, but
> as it's a simple change..

IMHO a case can be reasonably made that this is an oversight in the related
commit.  I've added the rest of the RMT here in case they see it
differently.

The patch LGTM, too.

-- 
nathan



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: Re: postmaster uses more CPU in 18 beta1 with io_method=io_uring
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX