On Sun, Jul 27, 2025 at 05:19:56PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> heap2_desc apparently inherited the extra bit filtering from heap_desc to
> ignore XLOG_HEAP_INIT_PAGE. But XLOG_HEAP2 only has real opcodes in the
> high bits there is no reason why there should be this filtering, and even if it
> eventually needed additional filtering we would need something specific to this
> resource manager anyway, so I think we can get rid of it as in the attached.
@@ -266,7 +266,6 @@ heap2_desc(StringInfo buf, XLogReaderState *record)
char *rec = XLogRecGetData(record);
uint8 info = XLogRecGetInfo(record) & ~XLR_INFO_MASK;
- info &= XLOG_HEAP_OPMASK;
if (info == XLOG_HEAP2_PRUNE_ON_ACCESS ||
info == XLOG_HEAP2_PRUNE_VACUUM_SCAN ||
info == XLOG_HEAP2_PRUNE_VACUUM_CLEANUP)
The relationship between XLOG_HEAP_OPMASK and heap2 is documented in
heapam_xlog.h. XLOG_HEAP2_MULTI_INSERT may have XLOG_HEAP_INIT_PAGE
set, so if we don't filter the contents from XLogRecGetInfo() then the
record description becomes incorrect for the XLOG_HEAP2_MULTI_INSERT
"MULTI_INSERT+INIT" case, no?
Apologies if I am missing your point.
--
Michael
