On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 04:11:49PM -0700, Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2025-09-09 at 10:39 -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> My first instinct was to consider this for back-patching, but I see that
>> you didn't back-patch commit 9af672b. Is there any technical reason we
>> shouldn't be back-patching these types of meson build script changes?
>
> I think you are right, I can't see any harm in backporting it, and
> arguably it's a bug: it would be annoying to compare performance across
> different versions with different build flags.
>
> I backported through 16.
Cool. I committed/back-patched the numeric.c fix to v16 as well.
--
nathan
