Re: Support for 8-byte TOAST values (aka the TOAST infinite loop problem) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Support for 8-byte TOAST values (aka the TOAST infinite loop problem)
Date
Msg-id aMjyQ-0lC1OvVzGO@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Support for 8-byte TOAST values (aka the TOAST infinite loop problem)  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 02:49:06PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I have dropped the amcheck test patch for now, which was fun but it's
> not really necessary for the "basics".  I have done also more tests,
> playing for example with pg_resetwal, installcheck and pg_upgrade
> scenarios.  I am wondering if it would be worth doing a pg_resetwal in
> the node doing an installcheck on the instance to be upgraded, bumping
> its next OID to be much larger than 4 billion, actually..

Four patches had conflicts with 748caa9dcb68, so rebased as v6.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "David G. Johnston"
Date:
Subject: Re: Improving the names generated for indexes on expressions
Next
From: shveta malik
Date:
Subject: Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication