On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 09:40:50AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> As a whole, the patch looks like a good balance, able to satisfy the
> new case you want to handle, Melanie. I am guessing that you'd want
> to tweak it and apply it yourself, so please feel free.
Hearing nothing, I'd like to move ahead with this improvement. I have
tweaked a bit the comments, as suggested. If one switches the check
of XLogNeedsFlush() from XLogInsertAllowed() to RecoveryInProgress(),
the recovery test 015 blows up as expected.
Any opinions or more word-smithing required?
--
Michael
