Hi,
On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 11:34:09AM +0100, Jakub Wartak wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2025 at 10:11 AM Jakub Wartak
> <jakub.wartak@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Heikki, thanks for having a look!
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 11:12 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 08/12/2025 11:54, Jakub Wartak wrote:
> > > > While thinking about cons, the only cons that I could think of is that
> > > > when we would be exposing something as 32-bits , then if the following
> > > > major release changes some internal structure/data type to be a bit
> > > > more heavy, it couldn't be exposed anymore like that (think of e.g.
> > > > 64-bit OIDs?)
> > > >
> > > > Any help, opinions, ideas and code/co-authors are more than welcome.
> >
> > > Expanding it to 64 bit seems fine as far as performance is concerned. I
> > > think the difficult and laborious part is to design the facilities to
> > > make use of it.
> >
> > Right, I'm very interested in hearing what could be added there/what
> > people want (bonus points if that is causing some performance issues
> > today and we do not have the area covered and exposing that would fit
> > in 32-bits ;) )
> >
>
> OK, so v3 is attached. Changes in v3:
Thanks for the new version!
It looks like that it needs a rebase. Also, FWIW, a quick scan shows a few
numbers of "XXX" and elog calls commented out (that are probably used during
your own debugging?).
Regards,
--
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
