On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 02:45:42PM +0800, Gavin LYU wrote:
> In the block handling the -e option, there’s a comment that appears to be a
> copy-paste error (line 190 and 191). It references a second %s, but none
> exists in that format string. Moreover, similar argument-handling code for
> other options doesn’t include such a comment.
>
> I believe it should be removed.
I disagree. This note still looks helpful to me when it comes to
translation even if it is incorrect: the %s markup refers to an option
switch.
--
Michael
