On 18-01-2018 20:34, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
> ...
> But ... let's not panic, but wait and see the final result of the
> discussion on the gcc PR. Jakub at least seems to think it ought
> to be a supportable case.
>
> What you could do in the meantime is work on finding a variation of
> Victor's test that will detect the bug regardless of -O level.
> If we do have hope that future gcc versions will handle this correctly,
> we'll need a better test rather than just summarily dismissing
> host_cpu = sparc.
Thanks, I'll try..
--
Marina Polyakova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
