Re: User documentation vs Official Docs - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: User documentation vs Official Docs
Date
Msg-id b046d8a2-ff24-7cb3-1e5e-f833dd454174@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: User documentation vs Official Docs  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: User documentation vs Official Docs
List pgsql-general
On 07/16/2018 03:14 PM, David G. Johnston wrote:

What does the community think about a community run, community organized, sub project for USER documentation? This type of documentation would be things like, "10 steps to configure replication", "Dumb simple Postgres backups",  "5 things to NEVER do with Postgres". I imagine we would sort it by version (9.6/10.0 etc...) as well as break it down via type (Administration, Tuning, Gotchas) etc...

What do we think?

​Politely tell them to buy some of the many well written books that are available on these very topics...

Politely tell them to buy a license to MSSQl...

Kind of misses the whole point doesn't it?

JD



David J.


-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc
***  A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is.  ***
PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development. 
Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org
*****     Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.   *****

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: User documentation vs Official Docs
Next
From: Tim Cross
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we need yet another IDE (SQL development assistant) for PostgreSQL?