Re: more anti-postgresql FUD - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Merlin Moncure
Subject Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Date
Msg-id b42b73150610131052h52d5adf4g885b1021ed4209b4@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: more anti-postgresql FUD  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
List pgsql-general
On 10/13/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> > Is that really true? In theory block n+1 could be half a revolution
> > after block n, allowing you to commit two transactions per revolution.
>
> Not relevant, unless the prior transaction happened to end exactly at a

does full page writes setting affect this?

merlin

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: A query planner that learns
Next
From: "Jim C. Nasby"
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioning vs. View of a UNION ALL