Re: Always bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jan Wieck
Subject Re: Always bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION?
Date
Msg-id b89df4d1-7627-4489-8199-34a7e1e20e15@wi3ck.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Always bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Always bump PG_CONTROL_VERSION?
List pgsql-hackers
On 5/13/21 6:45 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>               Bumping the version in the commit that changes
> things is not optional, because if you don't do that then you'll
> probably burn some other developer also working on HEAD.  So
> I don't want people thinking they can skip this because it was
> done at the beginning of the development cycle.

And we make sure this is done how?


Regards, Jan

-- 
Jan Wieck
Postgres User since 1994



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Borisov
Date:
Subject: Re: OOM in spgist insert
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: autovacuum: handle analyze for partitioned tables