Re: Logical Replication WIP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: Logical Replication WIP
Date
Msg-id b987ed34-b476-ee71-966e-b9eb6515fd71@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Logical Replication WIP  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Logical Replication WIP
List pgsql-hackers
On 12/09/16 21:54, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2016-09-12 21:47:08 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> On 09/09/16 06:33, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> The start_replication option pg_version option is not documented and
>>> not used in any later patch.  We can probably do without it and just
>>> rely on the protocol version.
>>>
>>
>> That's leftover from binary type data transfer which is not part of this
>> initial approach as it adds a lot of complications to both protocol and
>> apply side. So yes can do without.
>
> FWIW, I don't think we can leave this out of the initial protocol
> design. We don't have to implement it, but it has to be part of the
> design.
>

I don't think it's a good idea to have unimplemented parts of protocol, 
we have protocol version so it can be added in v2 when we have code that 
is able to handle it.

--   Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/  PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: inappropriate use of NameGetDatum macro
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: feature request: explain "with details" option