On 11/01/2018 08:40 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 05:56:24PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 11/01/2018 05:50 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> Are you thinking basically another status that's "Withdrawn", but
>>> keeping it, or actually removing the records completely?
>> I don't know enough about the app internals to comment. But it probably
>> shouldn't appear in the stats, or else should have its own category in the
>> stats.
> Or that's closer to "Rejected by the author himself"? "Withdrawn"
> sounds like a good term for that, we surely don't want to simply remove
> the thing entirely either. What's actually the issue with not tracking
> such things in the stats?
I don't have a strong opinion. It seemed to me that where something had
been created in error it would be best simply to be able to undo that.
But I can see arguments against.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
