On 2024/10/03 13:23, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 11:34 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2024/10/02 9:27, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> Sorry for being late in joining the review of this patch. Both 0001
>>> and 0003 look good to me. I have two comments on the 0002 patch:
>>
>> Thanks for the review!
>>
>>> I think that while scanning a file_fdw foreign table with
>>> log_verbosity='silent' the query is not interruptible.
>>
>> You're right. I added CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in the retry loop.
>>
>>> Also, we don't switch to the per-tuple memory context when retrying
>>> due to a soft error. I'm not sure it's okay as in CopyFrom(), a
>>> similar function for COPY command, we switch to the per-tuple memory
>>> context every time before parsing an input line. Would it be
>>> problematic if we switch to another memory context while parsing an
>>> input line? In CopyFrom() we also call ResetPerTupleExprContext() and
>>> ExecClearTuple() for every input, so we might want to consider calling
>>> them for every input.
>>
>> Yes, I've updated the patch based on your comment.
>> Could you please review the latest version?
>
> Thank you for updating the patch! All patches look good to me.
Thanks for the review! Pushed.
BTW, regarding the issue I mentioned earlier about file_fdw not reporting
the number of tuples processed and skipped in the pg_stat_progress_copy view,
I'll start a new thread to discuss this further.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
