Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson
Date
Msg-id bf21fa27-a533-cead-c2c2-181ffdc7b71b@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/13/21 5:46 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2021-10-13 16:06:32 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> If you prep a patch I'll test it.
> Well, right now I'm wondering if the better fix is to just remove the whole
> win32 block. I don't know how far back, but afaict it's not needed. Seems to
> have been needed for narwhal at some point, according to 02b61dd08f99. But
> narwhal is long dead.
>
Ok, I'll test it out.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: GIN pending list cleanup during autoanalyze blocks cleanup by VACUUM
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: should we allow users with a predefined role to access pg_backend_memory_contexts view and pg_log_backend_memory_contexts function?