Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0
Date
Msg-id c4f54c52fcf4637728ff8c1538879fa9b5245b24.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Update Unicode data to Unicode 16.0.0  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 2025-01-22 at 19:08 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> But I don't think it would be a compile-time decision.  I think it
> would
> be a run-time selection, similar to the theorized multiple-ICU-
> versions
> feature.  (Those two features might even go together, since a given
> ICU
> version also sort of assumes a given Unicode version.)

I am trying to get there, and the ctype methods patch is a step in that
direction, but I don't think we will have full the full multi-library-
versions work in v18.

A compile-time option does have a chance for v18, and if that satisfies
the immediate concerns of packagers, then we can still update Unicode
in the default build.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Wrong security context for deferred triggers?
Next
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: Re: XMLDocument (SQL/XML X030)