Re: Faster methods for getting SPI results (460%improvement) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: Faster methods for getting SPI results (460%improvement)
Date
Msg-id cfb4a918-bbeb-3ca6-2cb8-cbf54fbaddaf@openscg.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Faster methods for getting SPI results (460%improvement)  (Jim Nasby <jim.nasby@openscg.com>)
Responses Re: Faster methods for getting SPI results (460% improvement)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/5/17 7:44 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> Updated patches attached, but I still need to update the docs.

Attached is a complete series of patches that includes the docs patch.

Right now, the docs don't include a concrete example, because adding one 
would be a pretty large if it demonstrated real usage, which presumably 
means Yet Another Contrib Module strictly for the purpose of 
demonstrating something. Rather than doing that, ISTM it'd be better to 
point the user at what plpythonu is doing.

Another option would be to have a very simple example that only uses 
*receiveSlot, but that seems rather pointless to me.
-- 
Jim Nasby, Chief Data Architect, Austin TX
OpenSCG                 http://OpenSCG.com

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Faster methods for getting SPI results (460% improvement)
Next
From: Keith Fiske
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning