Hello!
On 03.04.2023 21:49, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Anton A. Melnikov" <aamelnikov@inbox.ru> writes:
>> Now there are no any pending questions, so moved it to RFC.
>
> I did not think this case was worth memorializing in a test before,
> and I still do not. I'm inclined to reject this patch.
Earlier, when discussing this test, there was a suggestion like this:
> If we were just adding a
> query or two to an existing scenario, that could be okay;
The current version of the test seems to be satisfies this condition.
The queries added do not affect the total test time within the measurement error.
This case is rare, of cause, but it really took place in practice.
So either there are some more reasons why this test should not be accepted that
i do not understand, or i misunderstood something from the above.
Could you help me to figure out, please.
Would be very grateful.
Sincerely yours,
--
Anton A. Melnikov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company
