On 23.10.23 05:53, Euler Taveira wrote:
> Let's continue with the bike shedding... I agree with Peter E that this name
> does not express what this tool is. At the moment, it only have one action:
> create. If I have to suggest other actions I would say that it could support
> switchover option too (that removes the infrastructure created by this
> tool).
> If we decide to keep this name, it should be a good idea to add an option to
> indicate what action it is executing (similar to pg_recvlogical) as
> suggested
> by Peter.
Speaking of which, would it make sense to put this tool (whatever the
name) into the pg_basebackup directory? It's sort of related, and it
also shares some code.
