Re: pg_restore -j - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: pg_restore -j
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10909171105g36d667e2le5c4c360c33415dd@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_restore -j  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: pg_restore -j
Re: pg_restore -j
List pgsql-general
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 11:48 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>> I'm trying to do a parallel restore with pg_restore -j but I'm only
>> seeing one CPU being used really.   The file is custom format, but was
>> made by pg_dump for pgsql 8.3.  Is that a problem? Do I need a backup
>> made with 8.4 to run parallel restore?
>
> Yes I believe but I don't recall. You could dump the TOC and note
> differences.

I kinda figured, I'm making a dump with pg84 now to test with.  I'm
really hoping for a noticeable improvement in restore times, as we're
in the 1.5 to 2 hour range right now.

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore -j
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore -j