Re: limiting performance impact of wal archiving. - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: limiting performance impact of wal archiving.
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10911100743j640c471cn78b5394dca2b5120@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: limiting performance impact of wal archiving.  (Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Desktop drive can easily do 60MB/s in *sequential* read/write.
> We use high performance array of 15.000rpm SAS disk on an octocore
> 32GB and IO is always a problem.

How man drives in the array?  Controller? RAID level?

> I explain the problem :
>
> This server (doing wal archiving) is the master node of the
> over-blog's server farm.
> hundreds of GB of data, tens of millions of articles and comments,
> millions of user, ...
> ~250 read/write sql requests per seconds for the master
> ~500 read sql request per slave.

That's really not very fast.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Laurent Laborde
Date:
Subject: Re: limiting performance impact of wal archiving.
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: limiting performance impact of wal archiving.