Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
Date
Msg-id e4387c6959c9ed0d6dc9f14e01ff191f3e1a30c0.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Move defaults toward ICU in 16?
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 09:59 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
> I am saying that pg_upgrade should be able to deal with the
> difference. The
> details of how to implement that, don't matter that much.

To clarify, you're saying that pg_upgrade should simply update
pg_database to set the new databases' collation fields equal to that of
the old cluster?

I'll submit it as a separate patch because it would be independently
useful.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: recovery modules
Next
From: Yuya Watari
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions