Re: REINDEX vs VACUUM - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Brad White
Subject Re: REINDEX vs VACUUM
Date
Msg-id e704db4f-8c80-d4a9-f450-97443b0df7b6@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: REINDEX vs VACUUM  (Ron <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 1/4/2023 9:34 AM, Ron wrote:
> I don't think VACUUM FULL (copy the table, create new indices and 
> other metadata all in one command) actually vacuums tables.  It's a 
> misleading name.
>
> Something like REBUILD TABLE would be a better name. 

Well s***.

That explains a lot. Thanks for clearing that up for me.





pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bryn Llewellyn
Date:
Subject: Re: What is the best setup for distributed and fault-tolerant PG database?
Next
From: "Peter J. Holzer"
Date:
Subject: Re: REINDEX vs VACUUM