On Tue, 2021-06-29 at 14:50 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com> writes:
> > What would you think about a src/port of asprintf()? Maybe libpq
> > doesn't change quickly enough to worry about it, but having developers
> > revisit stack allocation for strings every time they target the libpq
> > parts of the code seems like a recipe for security problems.
>
> The existing convention is to use pqexpbuffer.c, which seems strictly
> cleaner and more robust than asprintf. In particular its behavior under
> OOM conditions is far easier/safer to work with. Maybe we should consider
> moving that into src/common/ so that it can be used by code that's not
> tightly bound into libpq?
I will take a look. Were you thinking we'd (hypothetically) migrate all
string allocation code under src/common to pqexpbuffer as part of that
move? Or just have it there to use as needed, when nm complains?
--Jacob
