Re: Two queries are better than one? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Gnanavel S
Subject Re: Two queries are better than one?
Date
Msg-id eec3b03c05072821386a068a13@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Two queries are better than one?  (Karim Nassar <karim.nassar@acm.org>)
List pgsql-performance


On 7/29/05, Karim Nassar <karim.nassar@acm.org> wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 09:41 +0530, Gnanavel S wrote:

>
>         Joined:
>
>         test=> explain analyze
>         test->    SELECT cli_name,order.*
>         test->               FROM order
>         test->               JOIN client ON (ord_client = cli_code)
>         test->              WHERE ord_batch='343B' AND
>         ord_id='12-645';
>
> where is the cli_code condition in the above query?

I don't understand the question. ord_client is the client code, and
cli_code is the client code, for their respective tables. batch/id is
unique, so there is only one record from order, and only one client to
associate.

Clearer?

ok.

 Reason might be comparing with a literal value (previous case) is cheaper than comparing with column(as it has to be evaluated).  But with the previous case getting and assigning the cli_code in the application and executing in db will be time consuming as it includes IPC cost.

--
Karim Nassar <karim.nassar@acm.org >




--
with regards,
S.Gnanavel
Satyam Computer Services Ltd.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Left joining against two empty tables makes a query
Next
From: Matthew Schumacher
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0