Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning
Date
Msg-id f3350470-5ff4-9b52-618a-0c13091c0b20@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 02/23/2017 09:27 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:

> * "Good work so far, but there is still a very significant amount of
> work to do."
>
> There is always more work to do, so why say so? I think that the
> implication is that this isn't complete as a feature that goes into
> the next release, which I disagree with. There is nothing
> disappointing to me about this feature, and, as I said, I am
> unsurprised that it doesn't support certain things.
>


I don't think we need to start going down the avenue of "you could be 
nicer". We can all be nicer and we all have our good and bad days.

If we start worrying about egos to this degree, we will never get 
anything done.

JD
-- 
Command Prompt, Inc.                  http://the.postgres.company/                        +1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Documentation improvements for partitioning
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] \if, \elseif, \else, \endif (was Re: PSQL commands:\quit_if, \quit_unless)