Commitfest 2023-09 has finished - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Commitfest 2023-09 has finished
Date
Msg-id f3e6758d-58da-a195-de8a-ccf547ac0620@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-hackers
As September has ended, I have closed commitfest 2023-09.  The status 
before I started moving patches over was

Status summary: Needs review: 189. Waiting on Author: 30. Ready for 
Committer: 28. Committed: 68. Moved to next CF: 1. Returned with 
Feedback: 16. Rejected: 1. Withdrawn: 5. Total: 338.

The final status is now

Status summary: Committed: 68. Moved to next CF: 248. Withdrawn: 5. 
Rejected: 1. Returned with Feedback: 16. Total: 338.

The "Committed" number is lower than in the preceding commitfests, but 
it is actually higher than in the September commitfests of preceding years.

I did some more adjustments of status and removal of stale reviewer 
entries.  But overall, everything looked pretty accurate and up to date.

In the November commitfest right now, there are more than 50 patches 
that are 2 or 3 CFs old (meaning they arrived after PG16 feature freeze) 
and that have no reviewers.  Plus at least 30 patches without reviewers 
that are completely new in the November CF.  Also, it looks like a lot 
of these are in the Performance category, which is typically harder to 
review and get agreement on.  So, while we do have some really old 
patches that, well, are hard to get sorted out, there is a lot of new 
work coming in that really just needs plain reviewer attention.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: On login trigger: take three
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [DOCS] HOT - correct claim about indexes not referencing old line pointers