http://www.google.com/trends?q=PostgreSQL%2C+PostgreSQL+8%2C+PostgreSQL+8.4%2C+PostgreSQL+8.3&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0 Anyway, these graphs only demonstrate a slow in whatever this trend represents (google searches afaik). The focus should be on "Where do we get the real data from? Where are we standing at the moment? Do we need more or less effort?" A press coverage is just a press coverage and nothing else. gb.- On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Guido Barosio<gbarosio@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, you have not reached 8.3 :) > > http://www.google.com/trends?q=PostgreSQL+8.4%2C+PostgreSQL+8.3&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0 > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Euler Taveira de > Oliveira<euler@timbira.com> wrote: >> Guido Barosio escreveu: >>> How can we relate this, with the efforts being done? >>> >>> http://www.google.com/trends?q=PostgreSQL&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0 >>> >> IMHO your search should be: >> >> http://www.google.com/trends?q=PostgreSQL+8.4&ctab=0&geo=all&date=all&sort=0 >> >> And I think we have been achieved our goals. Release 8.4 has been equally >> covered by press comparing with the other DBMSs when they were released. >> >> >> -- >> Euler Taveira de Oliveira >> http://www.timbira.com/ >> >
pgsql-advocacy by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
