Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names
Date
Msg-id f8888d3b-2850-f4b3-0152-625b0d86838a@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names
List pgsql-hackers
On 09.06.21 03:57, Thomas Munro wrote:
> test deadlock-simple              ... ok           20 ms
> test deadlock-hard                ... ok        10624 ms
> test deadlock-soft                ... ok          147 ms
> test deadlock-soft-2              ... ok         5154 ms
> test deadlock-parallel            ... ok          132 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-1 ... ok          553 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-2 ... ok          234 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-3 ... ok         2389 ms
> test detach-partition-concurrently-4 ... ok         1876 ms
> 
> Any objections to making these new tests line up with the rest?

Can we scan all the test names first and then pick a suitable length?





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Adjust pg_regress output for new long test names
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Character expansion with ICU collations