On 2018/11/09 4:39, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Pushed.
Thank you for committing. I've closed the CF entry.
> I included the test case for collations to the three branches, but no
> code changes. We can patch master for the handling of collations per
> your patch,
Okay, but should we back-patch it by adding WARNING to back-branches as
you suggest?
> and if somebody has it, a change to how defaults are applied
> when routing tuples.
I haven't written such a patch yet. Do we want such a feature?
Thanks,
Amit