On 2024/09/24 23:26, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Yeah, this is what I mentioned upthread [0]. If the user doesn't specify
> anything in --table or --schema, then it's probably fine to silently skip
> objects for which they lack privileges. But if they do explicitly specify
> a table or schema that they cannot vacuum, then IMHO it'd be better to
> fail.
This could be debatable. To be honest, if I run something like vacuumdb mydb,
*I* expect all eligible tables in that database to be vacuumed. If I forget to
grant the necessary privileges to the role, I’d prefer to see errors from
vacuumdb so I can fix the permissions.
If we decide to skip tables without enough privilege, I’d prefer adding
an option like --skip-unprivileged-tables rather than changing the default behavior.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
