On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 01:34:34 -0600, "Len Morgan"
<len-morgan@crcom.net> wrote:
>>GROUP BY
> > field1,
> > field2,
> >name;
>I think the problem is that you don't have a column to group on.
field1, field2, and name are the grouping columns.
>Try adding
>SELECT ....,count(*).... so that there is an aggregate of some kind.
You don't need an aggregate in a GROUP BY query. A SELECT ... GROUP
BY without any aggregate behaves like SELECT DISTINCT. There's
nothing wrong with it. Performance might be a different story.
BTW, Franco's problem has been recognised as a bug and a patch has
already been published (cf. Tom Lane's mail in this thread).
ServusManfred
