Re: [HACKERS] Bug in current network.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Bug in current network.c
Date
Msg-id m0zYwM9-0000eRC@druid.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Bug in current network.c  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thus spake Tom Lane
> darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain) writes:
> > For some reason network.c reverted to an earlier version in the tree.  Your
> > patch was already submitted by someone (Bruce?) but the changes, like my
> > other changes, were lost.
> 
> It looks like Bruce copied-and-pasted a little too much while applying
> your last patch.  I had fixed the "< 0" tests that ought to be "== NULL"
> on Sunday, but one of them was on a line that you wanted changed for other
> reasons, and it went back to being wrong...

Trust us.  We're professionals.  :-)

-- 
D'Arcy J.M. Cain <darcy@{druid|vex}.net>   |  Democracy is three wolves
http://www.druid.net/darcy/                |  and a sheep voting on
+1 416 424 2871     (DoD#0082)    (eNTP)   |  what's for dinner.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Taral"
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] 6.4 BETA2 fails to compile on Digital Unix 4.0d
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/include/catalog pg_operator.h'