Re: Red Hat Policies Regarding PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Mark Morgan Lloyd
Subject Re: Red Hat Policies Regarding PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id n0qaeq$fec$1@pye-srv-01.telemetry.co.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Red Hat Policies Regarding PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Red Hat Policies Regarding PostgreSQL
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Convey <smconvey@gmail.com> writes:
>> Due to policies for Red Hat family distributions, the PostgreSQL
>> installation will not be enabled for automatic start or have the database
>> initialized automatically.
>
>> To which policies are they referring? Licensing, security, or other?​
>
> Packaging policy: daemons shall not run merely by virtue of having been
> installed.  Otherwise, if you install a boatload of software without
> checking each package, you'd have a boatload of probably-unwanted and
> possibly-incorrectly-configured daemons running.  Which is a performance
> problem and likely a security hazard too.
>
> It's a good policy IMO (though I used to work there so no doubt I've just
> drunk too much Red Hat koolaid).

Seems reasonable. In fact somewhat better than current KDE as in e.g.
Debian "Jessie", which embeds a copy of MySQL whether the the user wants
to use it or not.

--
Mark Morgan Lloyd
markMLl .AT. telemetry.co .DOT. uk

[Opinions above are the author's, not those of his employers or colleagues]


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "657985552@qq.com"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Re: [GENERAL] 回复: postgres cpu 100% need help
Next
From: mephysto
Date:
Subject: Partitioning table by multiple columns