Hi,
On 2025-01-09 16:50:45 +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 at 22:26, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> === 0005
>
> > I think this is much better than before. I don't love PM_WAIT_XLOG_ARCHIVAL,
> > but I can't think of anything better.
>
> I liked this, I think it is good enough.
>
> - PM_SHUTDOWN, /* waiting for checkpointer to do shutdown
> + PM_WAIT_XLOG_SHUTDOWN, /* waiting for checkpointer to do shutdown
> * ckpt */
>
> There are couple of variables and functions which include pm_shutdown
> in their names:
> pending_pm_shutdown_request
> handle_pm_shutdown_request_signal()
> process_pm_shutdown_request()
>
> Do you think these need to be updated as well?
I don't think so - I think those are actually not specifically referencing the
PM_SHUTDOWN symbol. They're referencing shutting down postmaster - which
neither starts nor ends with PM_SHUTDOWN.
Greetings,
Andres Freund