On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
>> >> [This is an open item for 9.0, hence the response to an apparently old
>> >> hackers thread]
>>
>> > Thanks for the reply; 9.0 open item removed.
>>
>> I think you misread his reply. Please put that back.
>
> OK, I re-read it and still don't understand, but I don't have to.
I re-read it too and I don't understand either. This is LISTED as an
open item for 9.0, but it is apparently not a new regression, so I
think we should move it to the Todo list instead. This problem was
discovered six months ago, is not a new regression, and there is
apparently no movement toward a fix, so it doesn't make sense to me
that we should hold up either 9.0 beta or 9.0 final on account of it.
Or am I confused?
....Robert
