Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thom Brown
Subject Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders
Date
Msg-id s2rbddc86151004010221ld585befar76724e910bca6fe6@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sorry, too many standbys already vs. MaxWalSenders vs. max_wal_senders  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1 April 2010 01:51, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com> wrote:
> [patch]

As a general rule, I really appreciate people being willing to take
the time to put proposed changes into patch form, even if they're
small, but this three-line patch contains two bugs.  :-(

Thanks for your many typo corrections, though!

...Robert

Or my changes were so good, the world wasn't ready for it?  Yes, I think that was it.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature request - function-based deferrable uniques.
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Postgres 9.1 - Release Theme