Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 August 1999

00:29 Re: Patches for Postgresql on Linux/Alpha! Thomas Lockhart
01:01 initdb needed for newest sources Tom Lane
02:36 Re: Bug#41277: postgresql 6.5.1-3 + sparc (sun4u) == nasty nasty crashes Oliver Elphick
11:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bug#41277: postgresql 6.5.1-3 + sparc (sun4u) == nasty nasty crashes Tom Lane
13:01 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bug#41277: postgresql 6.5.1-3 + sparc (sun4u) == nasty nasty crashes Michael Alan Dorman
15:03 Re: [HACKERS] IPC Memory problem with Postmaster on BSDi 4.x J. Michael Roberts
16:17 Re: [HACKERS] IPC Memory problem with Postmaster on BSDi 4.x Bruce Momjian
17:07 Re: [HACKERS] IPC Memory problem with Postmaster on BSDi 4.x Thomas Lockhart
17:25 Re: [HACKERS] initdb needed for newest sources Thomas Lockhart
18:02 Re: [HACKERS] IPC Memory problem with Postmaster on BSDi 4.x Bruce Momjian
18:21 [HACKERS] Installation procedure. J. Michael Roberts
23:33 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure. Thomas Lockhart
23:52 Re: [HACKERS] IPC Memory problem with Postmaster on BSDi 4.x Tom Lane
23:54 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure. J. Michael Roberts

2 August 1999

00:03 Re: [HACKERS] initdb needed for newest sources Tom Lane
00:16 Re: [HACKERS] IPC Memory problem with Postmaster on BSDi 4.x J. Michael Roberts
00:34 [HACKERS] A suggestion on finding those pesky .so files J. Michael Roberts
00:48 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure. Tom Lane
00:56 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure. J. Michael Roberts
01:11 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure. Tom Lane
01:23 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure. The Hermit Hacker
01:24 Re: [HACKERS] A suggestion on finding those pesky .so files Tom Lane
01:42 Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure. Thomas Lockhart
02:14 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bug#41277: postgresql 6.5.1-3 + sparc (sun4u) == nasty nasty crashes Adam Di Carlo
05:00 Optimizer hints John Ridout
08:37 [GENERAL] database access authentication: crypted passwords Oleg Broytmann
08:42 Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer hints Hannu Krosing
08:42 [GENERAL] read-only databases Oleg Broytmann
08:57 RE: [HACKERS] Optimizer hints John Ridout
09:18 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] database access authentication: crypted passwords Gene Sokolov
09:20 Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? G. Anthony Reina
09:37 Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] database access authentication: crypted passwords Oleg Broytmann
10:17 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? Tom Lane
10:23 flex (was Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure.) Tom Lane
10:31 Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer hints Bruce Momjian
10:47 Re: flex (was Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure.) Thomas Lockhart
11:31 Re: flex (was Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure.) Bruce Momjian
11:39 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? G. Anthony Reina
11:51 ... The Hermit Hacker
11:52 Re: flex (was Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure.) J. Michael Roberts
12:28 bytea type and precision. Michael J Schout
12:31 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? Bruce Momjian
12:50 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? Tom Lane
12:54 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? G. Anthony Reina
12:57 Re: flex (was Re: [HACKERS] Installation procedure.) Tom Lane
13:03 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? Bruce Momjian
13:09 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? G. Anthony Reina
13:31 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? G. Anthony Reina
14:24 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? Tom Lane
14:49 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursor header changed from 20 to 16 Bytes? G. Anthony Reina
16:00 Any 6.5.2 activities ? Oleg Bartunov
16:27 Selectivity estimates paper, and Mariposa Ross J. Reedstrom
16:45 Re: [HACKERS] Selectivity estimates paper, and Mariposa Bruce Momjian
16:53 Re: [HACKERS] Any 6.5.2 activities ? The Hermit Hacker
17:09 Re: Selectivity estimates paper, and Mariposa Tom Lane
18:24 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Ross J. Reedstrom
18:31 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Tom Lane
18:52 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Tom Lane
22:31 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Bruce Momjian
22:31 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Bruce Momjian
23:38 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Ross J. Reedstrom
23:43 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Bruce Momjian

3 August 1999

05:04 RE: John Ridout
07:26 Re: [HACKERS] RE: Hannu Krosing
09:33 || PostgreSQL Duane Currie
09:57 Threads Duane Currie
10:05 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Tom Lane
10:21 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Thomas Lockhart
10:24 Mega-commits to "stable" version Tom Lane
10:25 Re: [HACKERS] || PostgreSQL Thomas Lockhart
10:37 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Tom Lane
10:39 RE: [HACKERS] Threads Ansley, Michael
10:40 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Dmitry Samersoff
10:44 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Duane Currie
10:47 Re: [HACKERS] Mega-commits to "stable" version Thomas Lockhart
10:57 Re: [HACKERS] || PostgreSQL Ross J. Reedstrom
11:13 Re: bad select performance fixed by forbidding hash joins Tom Lane
11:14 Re: [HACKERS] Threads The Hermit Hacker
11:15 ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Adriaan Joubert
11:20 Re: [HACKERS] Mega-commits to "stable" version The Hermit Hacker
11:40 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Tom Lane
11:47 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Tom Lane
11:57 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Ross J. Reedstrom
11:58 Curiosity on deferred/delayed balancing btrees Colin McCormack
12:03 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Vince Vielhaber
12:11 Re: [HACKERS] Threads The Hermit Hacker
12:12 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Bruce Momjian
12:14 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Tom Lane
12:19 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Bruce Momjian
12:20 RE: [HACKERS] Threads Magnus Hagander
12:20 Re: [HACKERS] Curiosity on deferred/delayed balancing btrees Bruce Momjian
12:34 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Duane Currie
12:35 RE: [HACKERS] Threads Magnus Hagander
12:49 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Tom Lane
13:00 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Tom Lane
13:39 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Bob Devine
13:41 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Bruce Momjian
14:28 Re: [HACKERS] Mega-commits to "stable" version Hannu Krosing
14:35 Backup database with entries > 8192 KBytes G. Anthony Reina
14:45 Re: [HACKERS] Mega-commits to "stable" version The Hermit Hacker
14:47 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Ross J. Reedstrom
19:58 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Lamar Owen

4 August 1999

02:01 Re: [HACKERS] Mariposa Adriaan Joubert
08:07 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Don Baccus
08:53 RE: [HACKERS] Threads Magnus Hagander
08:59 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Brian E Gallew
09:48 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Tom Lane
10:09 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Tom Lane
10:29 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Thomas Lockhart
10:54 Re: [HACKERS] Threads The Hermit Hacker
11:43 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Thomas Lockhart
11:45 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Adriaan Joubert
12:02 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Tom Lane
12:21 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Threads eem21@cam.ac.uk
13:03 Re: [HACKERS] Threads Michael Alan Dorman
13:37 Re: [HACKERS] Threads The Hermit Hacker
18:15 Re: [HACKERS] Backup database with entries > 8192 KBytes Tom Lane
18:35 Re: [HACKERS] Backup database with entries > 8192 KBytes G. Anthony Reina
19:01 parse_coerce question Tom Lane
20:01 Re: [HACKERS] parse_coerce question Bruce Momjian
21:19 INTERSECT/EXCEPT and duplicates? Tatsuo Ishii
21:45 Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT/EXCEPT and duplicates? Bruce Momjian
22:50 ... Hub.Org News Admin
23:58 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Vadim Mikheev

5 August 1999

00:22 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? The Hermit Hacker
00:40 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Tom Lane
01:17 Re: PG 6.5.1 RPMS Thomas Lockhart
01:19 Re: [HACKERS] parse_coerce question Thomas Lockhart
09:32 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Adriaan Joubert
09:43 Email Peter Mount
10:10 Re: [HACKERS] INTERSECT/EXCEPT and duplicates? Tom Lane
10:23 Re: [HACKERS] parse_coerce question Tom Lane
10:42 Re: [HACKERS] parse_coerce question Thomas Lockhart
10:53 New man pages Thomas Lockhart
10:53 Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Tom Lane
11:08 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Bruce Momjian
11:13 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] Threads Ewan Mellor
11:15 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Tom Lane
12:01 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Bruce Momjian
12:12 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Tom Lane
12:18 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Bruce Momjian
13:31 Re: PG 6.5.1 RPMS Lamar Owen
22:19 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Vadim Mikheev
22:37 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Bruce Momjian
23:12 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Vadim Mikheev
23:32 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Bruce Momjian

6 August 1999

00:03 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Vadim Mikheev
00:38 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Tom Lane
01:31 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Bruce Momjian
04:02 RE: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Ansley, Michael
04:17 Re: [HACKERS] Idea for speeding up uncorrelated subqueries Vadim Mikheev
04:26 [PHP3] mysql is case sensitive? (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
05:03 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Adriaan Joubert
06:00 6.5.2 Vadim Mikheev
09:53 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: btree scan list trashed ?? Tom Lane
09:54 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.2 Tom Lane
11:03 Re: [DOCS] New man pages Bruce Momjian
11:30 Re: [DOCS] New man pages Thomas Lockhart
11:42 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1, error in pg_dump Don Baccus
11:55 Re: [DOCS] New man pages Bruce Momjian
12:43 Unable to create tables... Don Baccus
14:15 Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Lamar Owen
14:27 plpgsql requires bison Bruce Momjian
14:29 Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Don Baccus
14:55 Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Don Baccus
15:47 Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Ross J. Reedstrom
15:55 Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Lamar Owen
16:01 Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Don Baccus
16:01 Re: [HACKERS] Unable to create tables... Don Baccus
18:03 OT: pgsql-ayuda. It´s working? F J Cuberos
18:26 Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql requires bison Tom Lane
18:37 Release 2 testing RPMS -- includes ALPHA patches. Lamar Owen
18:50 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1, error in pg_dump Tom Lane
19:06 Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql requires bison Bruce Momjian
20:32 Re: [PORTS] Release 2 testing RPMS -- includes ALPHA patches. Uncle George

7 August 1999

00:13 Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql requires bison Tom Lane
00:14 Re: [PORTS] Release 2 testing RPMS -- includes ALPHA patches. lamar.owen@wgcr.org
00:25 Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql requires bison Bruce Momjian
04:00 Inefficiencies in COPY command Wayne Piekarski
04:17 Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV on CREATE FUNCTION with plpgsql Wayne Piekarski
11:02 Re: [HACKERS] Inefficiencies in COPY command Tom Lane
11:49 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.1, error in pg_dump Don Baccus

8 August 1999

15:57 plpgsql grammar fix not so easy after all Tom Lane
20:09 Re: plpgsql grammar fix not so easy after all Bruce Momjian
22:59 Descending order Index scan patch Hiroshi Inoue
23:05 ... Hub.Org News Admin

9 August 1999

00:43 Re: [PATCHES] Descending order Index scan patch Bruce Momjian
06:35 Re: plpgsql requires bison wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
09:29 Re: [HACKERS] New man pages José Soares
10:12 Re: [HACKERS] New man pages Thomas Lockhart
10:47 Re: [HACKERS] New man pages Bruce Momjian
11:56 Re: [HACKERS] New man pages Thomas Good
12:11 Re: autoconf does not recognize HP-UX 11.00. Ryan Bradetich
13:49 Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Lamar Owen
15:17 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Peter Eisentraut
15:55 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) J. Michael Roberts
16:33 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Ross J. Reedstrom
18:38 Re: [HACKERS] Re: autoconf does not recognize HP-UX 11.00. Tom Lane
20:07 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Lamar Owen
22:18 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Thomas Lockhart
22:41 New man pages Thomas Lockhart
22:56 Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Bruce Momjian
23:05 Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Thomas Lockhart
23:08 Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Bruce Momjian
23:17 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) lamar.owen@wgcr.org
23:22 Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Thomas Lockhart
23:30 Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Bruce Momjian
23:32 Re: RPMs (was Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL") Thomas Lockhart

10 August 1999

00:00 Re: RPMs (was Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL") lamar.owen@wgcr.org
08:47 linuxdev.net poll results Vince Vielhaber
08:48 Re: [HACKERS] WAL: parallel logging Vadim Mikheev
08:49 another DECIMAL problem José Soares
08:49 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Oliver Elphick
08:53 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Thomas Lockhart
08:56 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Thomas Good
09:16 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Thomas Lockhart
09:16 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Oliver Elphick
09:18 Re: [HACKERS] another DECIMAL problem Thomas Lockhart
09:26 [INTERFACES] spi, tuples Collin F. Lynch
09:42 Re: [HACKERS] [INTERFACES] spi, tuples Thomas Lockhart
10:29 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Tom Lane
10:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Ross J. Reedstrom
10:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Thomas Lockhart
10:48 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Brook Milligan
11:03 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Tom Lane
11:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Oliver Elphick
11:19 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Tom Lane
12:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Brook Milligan
12:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Bruce Momjian
12:56 Re: [HACKERS] another DECIMAL problem Bruce Momjian
13:01 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Bruce Momjian
13:02 Drop table abort Jackson, DeJuan
13:27 Re: (fwd) Problems with Postgres Oliver Elphick
13:50 Drop table abort Jackson, DeJuan
14:01 Re: [HACKERS] Drop table abort Bruce Momjian
15:43 Re: [HACKERS] Re: (fwd) Problems with Postgres Oliver Elphick
17:10 ... Hub.Org News Admin
17:22 Re: [HACKERS] Re: (fwd) Problems with Postgres Tom Lane
17:34 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Tom Lane
17:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: (fwd) Problems with Postgres Oliver Elphick
17:47 RE: [HACKERS] Drop table abort Jackson, DeJuan
18:01 Crisp text editor Bruce Momjian
18:25 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor (probably OT) Hannu Krosing
18:56 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor (probably OT) Bruce Momjian
22:03 Crisp pricing Bruce Momjian
23:11 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Thomas Lockhart

11 August 1999

00:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages Bruce Momjian
01:32 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor Oleg Bartunov
02:20 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor (probably OT) Hannu Krosing
02:21 libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Constantin Teodorescu
02:33 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor Michael Robinson
06:52 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp pricing Vince Vielhaber
08:24 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Thomas Lockhart
08:28 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Constantin Teodorescu
08:34 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Thomas Lockhart
08:47 Query length string Ansley, Michael
09:01 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Constantin Teodorescu
09:23 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Thomas Lockhart
10:16 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Bruce Momjian
10:17 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor [definitely OT] Tom Lane
10:20 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor [definitely OT] Bruce Momjian
10:58 Re: [HACKERS] Query length string Tom Lane
11:06 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor [definitely OT] Tom Lane
11:56 Re: [HACKERS] Query length string Ross J. Reedstrom
16:03 Testing RPMS -- 6.5.1-3lo ready. Lamar Owen
16:47 We won! Tom Lockhart
16:53 RE: We won! Vince Vielhaber
22:18 ... Hub.Org News Admin
22:59 Re: We won! Vadim Mikheev
23:25 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Philip Warner

12 August 1999

02:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Theo Kramer
04:37 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Hannu Krosing
04:49 Index access using multi-column indices Hiroshi Inoue
09:29 Query string length Ansley, Michael
09:30 FW: Query string length Ansley, Michael
10:38 "20L" not interpreted as text. Collin F. Lynch
10:41 ... Hub.Org News Admin
10:45 Re: [HACKERS] Crisp text editor [definitely OT] Daniel Lundin
14:31 ... Hub.Org News Admin
17:13 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Kaare Rasmussen
17:24 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Vince Vielhaber
19:00 Re: [HACKERS] "20L" not interpreted as text. Tom Lane
19:26 Aborted Transaction During Vacuum G. Anthony Reina
19:50 Followup to: Aborted Transaction During Vacuum G. Anthony Reina
20:35 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Vadim Mikheev
21:30 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Tom Lane

13 August 1999

00:10 Single row fetch from backend Theo Kramer
02:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
02:31 Index scan? Theo Kramer
03:49 ... Hub.Org News Admin
04:34 Unlimited query strings Ansley, Michael
05:52 COPY Theo Kramer
06:25 Token length limit Ansley, Michael
06:37 behavior of setlocale under FreeBSD 3.1 Oleg Bartunov
09:06 Re: [HACKERS] COPYz Marc Howard Zuckman
10:13 Re: [HACKERS] COPY Tom Lane
10:14 Re: [HACKERS] Token length limit Tom Lane
10:25 RE: [HACKERS] Token length limit Ansley, Michael
10:36 Re: [HACKERS] Index scan? Tom Lane
10:44 Re: [HACKERS] Single row fetch from backend Tom Lane
10:59 PROPOSAL: Statement for one-sided joins Evan Simpson
11:24 Re: We won! Bruce Momjian
11:27 Re: [HACKERS] COPY Theo Kramer
11:28 Re: [HACKERS] Index scan? Theo Kramer
11:32 Re: [HACKERS] Single row fetch from backend Theo Kramer
11:53 Re: We won! Vince Vielhaber
12:22 Re: [HACKERS] libpgtcl and array fields return format - PROPOSAL Massimo Dal Zotto
12:59 Re: [HACKERS] Index scan? Bruce Momjian
13:20 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum G. Anthony Reina
13:32 Re: [HACKERS] Single row fetch from backend Bruce Momjian
13:38 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Tom Lane
13:51 Re: [HACKERS] Index scan? Tom Lane
14:00 Re: [HACKERS] PROPOSAL: Statement for one-sided joins Tom Lane
14:05 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Oliver Elphick
14:10 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Tom Lane
14:29 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Oliver Elphick
14:34 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum G. Anthony Reina
16:38 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum G. Anthony Reina
17:23 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Tom Lane
17:33 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Tom Lane
18:18 Ah-hah, I see the problem: EndPortalAllocMode() Tom Lane
19:31 How to get 'psql -q' runs really quiet ? Oleg Bartunov

14 August 1999

00:05 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum G. Anthony Reina
01:34 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! Thomas Lockhart
09:13 Re: [HACKERS] Single row fetch from backend Theo Kramer
09:54 Re: [HACKERS] Single row fetch from backend Thomas Lockhart
10:29 Re: [HACKERS] Aborted Transaction During Vacuum Tom Lane
10:47 Re: [BUGS] UNIQUE constraint no longer works under 6.5.1 Tom Lane
10:54 Re: [HACKERS] How to get 'psql -q' runs really quiet ? Tom Lane
11:10 Re: [SQL] Anyone recognise this error from PL/pgSQL? Tom Lane
11:18 Re: [BUGS] UNIQUE constraint no longer works under 6.5.1 Thomas Lockhart
11:27 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Anyone recognise this error from PL/pgSQL? Thomas Lockhart
11:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Anyone recognise this error from PL/pgSQL? Tom Lane
19:41 ... Hub.Org News Admin
19:54 Re: [BUGS] UNIQUE constraint no longer works under 6.5.1 Thomas Lockhart

15 August 1999

00:43 Re: [HACKERS] How to get 'psql -q' runs really quiet ? Bruce Momjian
09:56 Re: Returned mail: User unknown Bruce Momjian
10:14 psql return code for NOTICE Bruce Momjian
10:23 Statement Triggers. Ideas & help. F J Cuberos
18:37 RE: [HACKERS] Statement Triggers. Ideas & help. F J Cuberos
22:24 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker
22:24 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) The Hermit Hacker
22:28 Re: [HACKERS] Re: We won! The Hermit Hacker
22:57 Re: [HACKERS] New man pages The Hermit Hacker
22:57 libpq drops error messages received just before backend crash Tom Lane
23:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: autoconf does not recognize HP-UX 11.00. The Hermit Hacker
23:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages The Hermit Hacker
23:05 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages The Hermit Hacker
23:06 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ANNOUNCE] New man pages The Hermit Hacker

16 August 1999

00:36 WIN32 + MB fix Tatsuo Ishii
02:16 Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Thomas Lockhart
03:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
04:19 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Theo Kramer
05:08 ... Oleg Bartunov
05:37 backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
05:49 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.2 Oleg Broytmann
08:10 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
08:11 Re: your mail The Hermit Hacker
08:27 Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
08:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
08:34 Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
10:07 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Tom Lane
10:35 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
10:37 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Vince Vielhaber
10:51 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Tom Lane
11:01 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
11:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Theo Kramer
12:06 Binary cursors, numerics and other types Theo Kramer
12:20 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
12:42 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
12:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
13:08 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Chris Faylor
13:09 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Vince Vielhaber
13:39 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
13:48 Long table names Finn Kettner
13:54 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursors, numerics and other types Tom Lane
14:02 Re: [HACKERS] Long table names Bruce Momjian
14:19 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursors, numerics and other types Theo Kramer
14:30 Re: [HACKERS] Long table names Ross J. Reedstrom
16:13 Re: plpgsql requires bison Bruce Momjian
16:30 Re: [HACKERS] RECODE patches Bruce Momjian
16:33 Re: [HACKERS] README.locale patch 2 Bruce Momjian
17:17 Re: [HACKERS] Long table names Tom Lane
17:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail Hannu Krosing
20:42 Why does make_noname insert a SeqScan above sort/material node? Tom Lane
21:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Vadim Mikheev
21:27 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.2 Vadim Mikheev
21:34 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Tatsuo Ishii
21:38 Re: [HACKERS] Why does make_noname insert a SeqScan above sort/material node? Bruce Momjian
21:43 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Vince Vielhaber
21:56 Re: [HACKERS] Statement Triggers. Ideas & help. Vadim Mikheev
21:57 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
21:58 Re: [HACKERS] Index access using multi-column indices Vadim Mikheev
22:31 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Vadim Mikheev
23:58 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian

17 August 1999

01:29 Re: [HACKERS] Statement Triggers. Ideas & help. Philip Warner
02:13 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Thomas Lockhart
02:30 Re: [HACKERS] Binary cursors, numerics and other types Thomas Lockhart
02:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
02:50 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Oleg Bartunov
02:54 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
03:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
07:28 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Vince Vielhaber
08:07 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
08:22 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
08:25 Problem with query length Natalya S. Makushina
08:28 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
08:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
08:32 Query string lengths Ansley, Michael
09:01 Problem with query length Natalya S. Makushina
09:20 Problem with query length Natalya S. Makushina
09:23 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Tom Lane
09:45 Re: [HACKERS] Query string lengths Tom Lane
09:45 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
09:53 RE: [HACKERS] Problem with query length Ansley, Michael
09:55 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Tom Lane
10:09 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Tom Lane
10:20 RE: Patches Ansley, Michael
10:27 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
10:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
10:42 Re: [HACKERS] Query string lengths Thomas Lockhart
10:43 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
10:44 Re: [HACKERS] Query string lengths Bruce Momjian
10:46 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Bruce Momjian
11:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
11:06 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Bruce Momjian
11:35 RE: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow John Ridout
11:47 RE: [SQL] datediff function John Ridout
11:58 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
12:31 Drop user problem and DENY command Ricardo Coelho
13:08 Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Cary O'Brien
13:32 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Tom Lane
13:33 Re: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Bruce Momjian
13:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
13:49 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
13:53 Drop group problem and DENY command Ricardo Coelho
14:39 Re: [GENERAL] Large database Bruce Momjian
14:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
14:42 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
15:22 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
16:02 [HaruspeX] New site - Version 4.0 Released Keith Parks
16:31 Re: [HACKERS] [HaruspeX] New site - Version 4.0 Released The Hermit Hacker
16:33 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Large database Tom Lane
16:34 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Tom Lane
16:37 Re: [HACKERS] [HaruspeX] New site - Version 4.0 Released Bruce Momjian
17:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
17:33 "out of free buffers: time to abort" message? Tom Lane
18:00 Re: [HACKERS] "out of free buffers: time to abort" message? Bruce Momjian
18:24 getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime jim@reptiles.org (Jim Mercer)
19:25 Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime Ross J. Reedstrom
19:44 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Hiroshi Inoue
21:38 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
21:44 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
21:48 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
21:49 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
22:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Stephen Kogge
22:38 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
22:46 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow The Hermit Hacker
23:32 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian

18 August 1999

02:36 Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime Thomas Lockhart
03:59 RE: [HACKERS] Problem with query length Ansley, Michael
04:23 [Q] pg_dump with large object & backend cache... C.S.Park
04:45 vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii
05:32 Architecture Ansley, Michael
06:04 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
07:47 RE: [HACKERS] backend freezeing on win32 fixed (I hope ;-) ) Horak Daniel
08:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
09:34 Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime jim@reptiles.org (Jim Mercer)
10:00 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Tom Lane
10:04 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
10:30 Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime Tom Lane
10:59 Re: [HACKERS] Architecture Tom Lane
11:16 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [CORE] Re: tomorrow Bruce Momjian
14:12 [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Jackson, DeJuan
16:11 Re: Pronunciation of "PostgreSQL" (was: Re: [HACKERS] New man pages) Lamar Owen
17:01 Re: [HACKERS] [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Tom Lane
17:21 Re: [HACKERS] [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Egon Schmid
17:47 Re: [HACKERS] [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Michael Alan Dorman
19:00 RE: [HACKERS] [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Jackson, DeJuan
19:26 RE: [HACKERS] [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Vince Vielhaber

19 August 1999

08:12 RE: [HACKERS] [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Dmitry Samersoff
08:12 [HACKERS] Problem with query length Natalya S. Makushina
08:12 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii
08:12 RE: [HACKERS] Problem with query length Ansley, Michael
08:13 Survey Ansley, Michael
09:25 Mail list attachments Tom Lane
10:52 Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker
11:13 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Jeff Hoffmann
11:23 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Lamar Owen
11:25 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker
11:28 RE: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Jackson, DeJuan
11:32 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker
11:35 RE: [HACKERS] [OT] flex, yacc, and bison Jackson, DeJuan
11:40 RE: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker
11:49 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Vince Vielhaber
12:14 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Lamar Owen
12:21 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker
15:13 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Vince Vielhaber
17:18 Postgres' lexer Leon
17:41 ... Hub.Org News Admin
18:02 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
20:40 RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Hiroshi Inoue

20 August 1999

01:09 Re: Bug#43221: postgresql: When disk is full, insert corrupts indices Oliver Elphick
01:38 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bug#43221: postgresql: When disk is full, insert corrupts indices Vadim Mikheev
03:30 pg_log >> groving to infinity in 6.5.1 Richard Bouska
04:08 auth 30105652 subscribe pgsql-hackers xbouska@bsdi.infima.cz Richard Bouska
04:22 pg_log >> groving to infinity in 6.5.1 Richard Bouska
05:00 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
05:07 RE: [HACKERS] Problem with query length Ansley, Michael
05:23 Statement Triggers Patch F.J. Cuberos
05:31 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
05:42 RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Mike Mascari
06:10 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon
06:36 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
06:41 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
06:43 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
09:20 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
09:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bug#43221: postgresql: When disk is full, insert corrupts indices Tom Lane
09:35 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon
10:07 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
10:39 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
10:57 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Brook Milligan
12:21 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane
12:34 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane
12:38 What does it mean? Dmitry Samersoff
14:31 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon
17:16 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon
22:16 sorting by << correct for rtrees? Tom Lane
22:55 ... Hub.Org News Admin

21 August 1999

00:02 Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Tom Lane
02:34 Re: [HACKERS] Inefficiencies in COPY command Wayne Piekarski
04:22 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
23:30 Re: [HACKERS] pg_log >> growing to infinity in 6.5.1 Theo Kramer

22 August 1999

01:33 Re: [HACKERS] pg_log >> growing to infinity in 6.5.1 Theo Kramer
14:48 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Adam Haberlach
15:59 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker

23 August 1999

07:16 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bug#43221: postgresql: When disk is full, insert corrupts indices Vadim Mikheev
08:08 trigger: run in transaction Zakkr
09:08 ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 José Soares
09:53 Array-fields and many-to-many relations Alke
09:54 OID and PL/pgSQL trigger :-( Alke
10:04 Re: [HACKERS] RE: [SQL] datediff function José Soares
10:22 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 Tom Lane
10:24 Re: [HACKERS] Array-fields and many-to-many relations Tom Lane
10:46 ... Hub.Org News Admin
11:20 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 José Soares
11:32 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 Tom Lane
18:46 Attempt to crack ftp site Daniele Orlandi
19:21 Re: [MIRRORS] Attempt to crack ftp site The Hermit Hacker
19:56 RE: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Hiroshi Inoue
21:19 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii

24 August 1999

00:01 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Bruce Momjian
00:02 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Bruce Momjian
00:31 Re: [HACKERS] Inefficiencies in COPY command Bruce Momjian
01:21 Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker
02:02 ... Hub.Org News Admin
04:25 Lex and things... Ansley, Michael
05:48 AW: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
06:36 RE: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Hiroshi Inoue
06:37 Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon
07:00 RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael
07:19 RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael
08:29 Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon
08:29 Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon
09:17 RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael
09:36 Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Adriaan Joubert
10:13 Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon
10:13 Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon
10:59 Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Tom Lane
11:08 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
11:35 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Theo Kramer
12:21 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
13:01 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Brian E Gallew
14:59 Re: [HACKERS] Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Hannu Krosing
15:18 ... Hub.Org News Admin
16:22 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
16:37 Re: memory requirements question Tom Lane
16:52 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
17:15 Re: [HACKERS] Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Tom Lane
20:08 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii
20:15 RE: [HACKERS] Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Hiroshi Inoue
20:25 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Bruce Momjian
21:09 RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Hiroshi Inoue

25 August 1999

02:36 pg_log 100MB per day !!! on 5MB of data Richard Bouska
03:50 RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael
04:00 RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael
07:24 PATCH for Statement Triggers Support F.J. Cuberos
09:47 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
09:58 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii
10:01 RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Ansley, Michael
10:07 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size The Hermit Hacker
10:20 RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size The Hermit Hacker
10:23 RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Ansley, Michael
10:34 AW: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
10:34 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
10:57 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size The Hermit Hacker
11:05 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane
12:42 Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Leon
13:41 stuck spinlock Lori Allen
18:48 out of memory errors Clayton Cottingham

26 August 1999

12:43 Files ... Dmitry Samersoff
14:40 PG FAQ in PDF format Bruce Momjian

27 August 1999

08:39 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 José Soares
09:59 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 Tom Lane
10:46 Performance of MIN() and MAX() Gene Sokolov
11:31 Re: [HACKERS] Performance of MIN() and MAX() Tom Lane
15:07 Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime Tom Lane
15:12 Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime jim@reptiles.org (Jim Mercer)

28 August 1999

16:24 [Fwd: bug ? get_groname: group 0 not found] Spirou
17:20 Quoting in stored procedures Jochen Topf
17:27 Quoting in stored procedures pgsql-hackers@mail.remote.org
20:41 entries in pg_shadow Michael Richards
20:52 Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: bug ? get_groname: group 0 not found] Tom Lane
20:55 Re: [HACKERS] Quoting in stored procedures Tom Lane
21:06 Re: [HACKERS] entries in pg_shadow Tom Lane

29 August 1999

03:30 Cluster on (index-name) loose NOT NULL properties Constantin Teodorescu
08:47 ANSI SQL compliance Jernej Zajc
08:52 PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tatsuo Ishii
11:36 ... Hub.Org News Admin
12:50 Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Tom Lane
12:51 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane
13:49 Why not sub-selects in targetlists? Tom Lane
15:40 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker
16:20 Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Hannu Krosing
21:40 Re: [HACKERS] Why not sub-selects in targetlists? Vadim Mikheev
22:03 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tatsuo Ishii
22:12 ... Hub.Org News Admin

30 August 1999

02:27 Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Jernej Zajc
02:44 An optimisation question Constantin Teodorescu
05:26 ... Hub.Org News Admin
06:00 AW: [HACKERS] [Fwd: bug ? get_groname: group 0 not found] Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
08:16 IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current trees Horak Daniel
09:23 Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime José Soares
10:35 Re: [HACKERS] An optimisation question Tom Lane
11:05 Re: [HACKERS] Why not sub-selects in targetlists? Tom Lane
11:13 ... Hub.Org News Admin
11:34 Re: [HACKERS] An optimisation question Constantin Teodorescu
13:06 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker
13:54 Re: HELP Re: pg_group, etc.. Ricardo Coelho
13:55 bouncefilter added to majordomo lists ... The Hermit Hacker
13:56 ... Hub.Org News Admin
14:15 ... Hub.Org News Admin
16:54 Re: [HACKERS] Quoting in stored procedures pgsql-hackers@mail.remote.org
17:20 Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Oliver Elphick
17:21 ... Hub.Org News Admin
17:51 ... Hub.Org News Admin
18:03 File descriptor leakage? Cyrus Rahman
18:05 ... Hub.Org News Admin
20:03 File descriptor leakage? Cyrus Rahman
20:38 ... Hub.Org News Admin
21:51 Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Tom Lane
21:54 Re: libpq drops error messages received just before backend crash Tom Lane

31 August 1999

00:11 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Thomas Lockhart
00:46 RE: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Hiroshi Inoue
01:11 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/parser (parse_node.h parse_oper.h) Thomas Lockhart
02:48 Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Thomas Lockhart
03:05 Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Thomas Lockhart
04:31 Re: IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current trees yutaka tanida
04:37 Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Oleg Broytmann
05:31 Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Tatsuo Ishii
08:14 Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Oleg Bartunov
08:14 optimizer pruning problem Roberto Cornacchia
09:38 Re: [HACKERS] optimizer pruning problem Tom Lane
09:48 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/parser (parse_node.h parse_oper.h) Tom Lane
09:53 Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Tom Lane
10:01 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane
10:09 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
10:20 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane
10:22 RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael
11:13 Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Cyrus Rahman
11:24 Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? The Hermit Hacker
11:24 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Thomas Lockhart
11:51 Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Tom Lane
12:23 Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Vadim Mikheev
12:41 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Massimo Dal Zotto
12:41 bug in array contrib Massimo Dal Zotto
12:51 ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina
13:53 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane
14:13 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon
14:28 ... fjcuberos@rtva.es
14:34 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog Tom Lane
15:04 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina
15:51 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker
15:53 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog Tom Lane
16:10 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina
16:50 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Massimo Dal Zotto
16:50 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Massimo Dal Zotto
17:49 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog Tom Lane
17:52 CVS Broken? Keith Parks
17:54 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane
18:07 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina
18:19 OID 718 and Circle G. Anthony Reina
18:57 Re: CVS Broken? The Hermit Hacker
21:35 RE: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Hiroshi Inoue
21:52 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog Thomas Lockhart
22:20 Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Thomas Lockhart
22:52 Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Tatsuo Ishii
22:56 Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Thomas Lockhart