Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

21 June 2005

• 00:38   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Josh Berkus
• 01:04   Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Bruce Momjian
• 01:10   Autovacuum Patch Status Matthew T. O'Connor
• 01:12   Escape handling in strings Bruce Momjian
• 01:12   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Tom Lane
• 01:57   Re: Escape handling in strings Oliver Jowett
• 02:44   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes ITAGAKI Takahiro
• 03:31   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Michael Paesold
• 04:10   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Robert Treat
• 04:41   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Dave Page
• 04:49   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Dave Page
• 04:50   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Magnus Hagander
• 04:55   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 05:01   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Dave Page
• 05:16   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Dave Page
• 05:36   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication Alfranio Correia Junior
• 06:02   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Oleg Bartunov
• 06:35   Re: HOOKS for Synchronous Replication Alfranio Correia Junior
• 08:30   GiST concurrency Teodor Sigaev
• 08:48   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Bruno Wolff III
• 08:54   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Stephen Frost
• 08:54   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints John Hansen
• 09:04   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Bruno Wolff III
• 09:11   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints John Hansen
• 09:26   Re: query plan ignoring check constraints Bruno Wolff III
• 09:47   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Rod Taylor
• 09:57   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Matthew T. O'Connor
• 10:11   Re: Escape handling in strings Tom Lane
• 10:16   Re: Compiling tsearch2 on AIX Mag Gam
• 10:23   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Tom Lane
• 10:43   Re: GiST concurrency Tom Lane
• 10:43   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Robert Treat
• 10:45   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Tom Lane
• 10:56   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Tom Lane
• 11:04   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Tom Lane
• 11:07   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Stephen Frost
• 11:15   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Andrew Dunstan
• 11:32   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Tom Lane
• 11:39   Re: GiST concurrency Teodor Sigaev
• 12:27   Re: Escape handling in strings AgentM
• 12:29   Re: [GENERAL] Escape handling in strings Karl O. Pinc
• 12:32   Re: Compiling tsearch2 on AIX Tom Lane
• 12:34   Re: Escape handling in strings Tom Lane
• 12:38   Re: [GENERAL] index selection by query planner Tom Lane
• 12:44   Re: [PATCHES] default database creation with initdb Robert Treat
• 13:06   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Andrew Dunstan
• 13:18   Re: Escape handling in strings Bruce Momjian
• 13:46   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Victor Y. Yegorov
• 14:05   Server instrumentation patch Bruce Momjian
• 14:17   Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes Josh Berkus
• 14:47   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Bruce Momjian
• 14:48   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Bruce Momjian
• 14:52   Re: PROPOSAL - User's exception in PL/pgSQL Pavel Stehule
• 15:38   PROPOSAL FE/BE extension to handle IN/OUT parameters Dave Cramer
• 15:59   Why is checkpoint so costly? Josh Berkus
• 16:56   Strange logic for partial index proving Simon Riggs
• 17:07   Space reuse and autovacuum Bruce Momjian
• 17:29   Re: Strange logic for partial index proving Tom Lane
• 18:14   Re: PROPOSAL FE/BE extension to handle IN/OUT parameters Tom Lane
• 18:16   Re: Why is checkpoint so costly? Tom Lane
• 18:23   pg_terminate_backend idea Magnus Hagander
• 18:24   Re: PROPOSAL FE/BE extension to handle IN/OUT parameters Dave Cramer
• 18:26   Re: PROPOSAL FE/BE extension to handle IN/OUT parameters Tom Lane
• 18:34   Re: Strange logic for partial index proving Simon Riggs
• 18:37   Re: Why is checkpoint so costly? Alvaro Herrera
• 18:43   Re: Why is checkpoint so costly? Josh Berkus
• 18:49   Re: PROPOSAL FE/BE extension to handle IN/OUT parameters Tom Lane
• 19:01   Re: pg_terminate_backend idea Tom Lane
• 19:17   Re: PROPOSAL - User's exception in PL/pgSQL Tom Lane
• 19:22   Re: [PATCHES] Removing Kerberos 4 Tom Lane
• 19:28   Re: Strange logic for partial index proving Jim C. Nasby
• 19:36   major, minor and micro version Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
• 19:42   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Greg Sabino Mullane
• 19:42   The contrib hit list Tom Lane
• 19:49   Re: Strange logic for partial index proving Tom Lane
• 20:18   Re: Why is checkpoint so costly? Alvaro Herrera
• 20:21   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Michael Glaesemann
• 20:22   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Michael Glaesemann
• 20:24   Re: major, minor and micro version Alvaro Herrera
• 20:29   Re: Why is checkpoint so costly? Josh Berkus
• 20:30   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Josh Berkus
• 20:47   Re: The contrib hit list Jonah H. Harris
• 21:10   Re: Server instrumentation patch Andreas Pflug
• 21:21   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Marc G. Fournier
• 21:36   Re: PROPOSAL FE/BE extension to handle IN/OUT parameters Dave Cramer
• 22:15   Re: pg_terminate_backend idea Oliver Jowett
• 23:17   pl/pgsql: END verbosity Neil Conway
• 23:46   Re: The contrib hit list Tom Lane
• 23:48   Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity Josh Berkus
• 23:57   Re: Schedule for 8.1 feature freeze Tom Lane