Mailing lists [pgsql-jdbc]

22 July 2003

• 00:24   Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepared Statements] Oliver Jowett
• 00:36   Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepared Statements] Oliver Jowett
• 01:11   the IN clause saga Oliver Jowett
• 02:24   Re: Prepared Statements Fernando Nasser
• 02:25   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 02:26   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 02:27   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 02:28   Re: Prepared Statements Fernando Nasser
• 02:29   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 02:31   Re: Prepared Statements Fernando Nasser
• 02:32   Re: Prepared Statements Fernando Nasser
• 02:34   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 02:35   Re: Sql Types Supported Satyajit Das
• 02:37   Re: Prepared Statements Peter Kovacs
• 02:38   Re: Prepared Statements Peter Kovacs
• 02:39   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 02:42   Re: Fix for using JDK1.2 instead of JDK1.4 method in date/time/timestampToString Barry Lind
• 02:48   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 02:56   Please adjust the subject [Was: Prepared Statements] Fernando Nasser
• 02:56   Re: Prepared Statements Dmitry Tkach
• 02:58   Re: Prepared Statements Barry Lind
• 02:58   Re: Prepared Statements Csaba Nagy
• 03:04   Re: Prepared Statements Kris Jurka
• 03:07   Patch applied for SQL Injection vulnerability for setObject(int,Object,int) Barry Lind
• 03:38   Re: Patch applied for SQL Injection vulnerability for setObject(int,Object,int) Oliver Jowett
• 06:47   inet type handling Sylwester Rutkowski
• 07:48   Re: RFC: Removal of support for JDBC1 drivers. Dave Cramer
• 08:04   Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepared Paul Thomas
• 10:46   Re: Patch applied for SQL Injection vulnerability for setObject(int,Object,int) Oliver Jowett
• 10:49   Re: Patch applied for SQL Injection vulnerability for setObject(int,Object,int) Tom Lane
• 10:51   patch: make setObject(...) more consistent about the types it generates Oliver Jowett
• 10:57   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 11:01   Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepared Fernando Nasser
• 11:08   Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepared Felipe Schnack
• 11:08   Re: the IN clause saga Felipe Schnack
• 11:19   patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Oliver Jowett
• 11:24   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Felipe Schnack
• 11:26   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object Dmitry Tkach
• 11:26   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object Oliver Jowett
• 11:27   patch: support user implementations of Array in setArray() Oliver Jowett
• 11:30   Re: the IN clause saga Dmitry Tkach
• 11:31   Re: the IN clause saga Dmitry Tkach
• 11:33   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Oliver Jowett
• 11:39   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object Dmitry Tkach
• 11:40   Re: the IN clause saga Oliver Jowett
• 11:43   Re: the IN clause saga Dmitry Tkach
• 11:44   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 11:50   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 11:50   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Oliver Jowett
• 11:53   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 11:53   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Fernando Nasser
• 11:53   Re: the IN clause saga Oliver Jowett
• 11:55   Re: the IN clause saga Dmitry Tkach
• 11:56   Re: the IN clause saga Darin Ohashi
• 11:59   Re: the IN clause saga Tom Lane
• 12:03   Re: the IN clause saga Dmitry Tkach
• 12:04   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Fernando Nasser
• 12:04   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 12:10   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Felipe Schnack
• 12:12   Re: the IN clause saga Oliver Jowett
• 12:17   Re: the IN clause saga Felipe Schnack
• 12:20   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 12:22   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 13:10   Re: IN clauses via setObject(Collection) [Was: Re: Prepared Fernando Nasser
• 13:35   Re: Patch applied for SQL Injection vulnerability for setObject(int,Object,int) Barry Lind
• 13:35   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Barry Lind
• 13:46   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Felipe Schnack
• 14:04   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object David Wall
• 14:08   Re: jdbc batch performance problem pginfo
• 14:13   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object Fernando Nasser
• 14:16   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object David Wall
• 14:19   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object David Wall
• 14:19   Re: the IN clause saga Barry Lind
• 14:32   Re: the IN clause saga Darin Ohashi
• 14:34   Re: inet type handling scott.marlowe
• 14:41   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 14:42   Re: the IN clause saga Fernando Nasser
• 14:44   JDBC install João Paulo Vasconcellos
• 15:02   Re: JDBC install Fernando Nasser
• 15:23   Fix for getXXX (numbers) Kim Ho
• 15:40   unsuscribe Christian W. Flotzinger
• 15:57   getUDTs Kim Ho
• 16:06   Re: Fix for getXXX (numbers) Kim Ho
• 16:19   getMetaData Kim Ho
• 16:20   Re: RFC: Removal of support for JDBC1 drivers. Andrew Sullivan
• 16:37   Re: RFC: Removal of support for JDBC1 drivers. Fernando Nasser
• 17:29   Re: patch: tiny patch to correct stringbuffer size estimate Paul Thomas
• 18:04   store JDBC SQL in Properties Erik Price
• 18:14   ... Jason Bruce
• 18:51   Re: the IN clause saga Joe Conway
• 21:11   Re: Patch applied for SQL Injection vulnerability for setObject(int,Object,int) Oliver Jowett
• 21:14   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object Oliver Jowett
• 21:27   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object David Wall
• 21:37   Re: Detecting 'socket errors' - closing the Connection object Oliver Jowett
• 23:31   Re: RFC: Removal of support for JDBC1 drivers. Kris Jurka
• 23:49   Statement.executeQuery() and no results Sailesh Krishnamurthy
• 23:57   Re: Statement.executeQuery() and no results Kris Jurka
• 23:59   Re: the IN clause saga Kris Jurka