Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]

6 April 2005

• 05:45   Re: Follow-Up: How to improve db performance with $7K? Kevin Brown
• 08:11   RE : RE: Postgresql vs SQLserver for this application ? bsimon@loxane.com
• 08:30   Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? William Yu
• 09:12   Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ? Simon Riggs
• 09:16   Re: Sustained inserts per sec ... ? Simon Riggs
• 12:28   Re: Follow-Up: How to improve db performance with $7K? Steinar H. Gunderson
• 14:26   Re: Follow-Up: How to improve db performance with $7K? PFC
• 14:33   Re: Follow-Up: How to improve db performance with $7K? Steinar H. Gunderson
• 16:35   Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? Alex Turner
• 16:38   Re: RE : RE: Postgresql vs SQLserver for this application ? Alex Turner
• 17:13   Re: RE : RE: Postgresql vs SQLserver for this application ? Mohan, Ross
• 17:39   Re: RE : RE: Postgresql vs SQLserver for this application Steve Wampler
• 17:41   Re: RE : RE: Postgresql vs SQLserver for this Rod Taylor
• 17:44   Re: RE : RE: Postgresql vs SQLserver for this application ? Mohan, Ross
• 17:48   Re: RE : RE: Postgresql vs SQLserver for thisapplication ? Mohan, Ross
• 17:54   Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Arjen van der Meijden
• 18:02   Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Steve Atkins
• 18:02   Réf. : Re: RE : RE: Postgresql vsSQLserver for this bsimon@loxane.com
• 18:18   Re: Réf. : Re: RE : RE: Postgresql Rod Taylor
• 18:40   Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Arjen van der Meijden
• 18:42   Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Tom Lane
• 18:43   Re: Réf Steinar H. Gunderson
• 18:45   Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Dave Held
• 19:00   Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Arjen van der Meijden
• 19:09   Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Tom Lane
• 19:18   Re: RE : RE: Postgresql vs SQLserver for thisapplication ? Alex Turner
• 19:23   Re: Réf Rod Taylor
• 19:36   Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Mischa
• 19:40   Re: Réf Alex Turner
• 19:46   COPY Hacks (WAS: RE: Postgresql vs SQLserver for this application ?) Mischa
• 20:02   Re: Réf Rod Taylor
• 20:54   Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Tom Lane
• 21:01   Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? William Yu
• 21:08   Re: COPY Hacks (WAS: RE: Postgresql vs SQLserver for this application ?) Dave Held
• 21:28   Re: COPY Hacks (WAS: RE: Postgresql vs SQLserver for this application ?) Tom Lane
• 21:51   Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient Tom Lane
• 23:09   Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient) Tom Lane
• 23:12   Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? Alex Turner
• 23:25   Re: [HACKERS] Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient) Jim C. Nasby
• 23:35   Re: [HACKERS] Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan for relatively simple query seems to be very inefficient) Tom Lane
• 23:41   Re: How to improve db performance with $7K? Jim C. Nasby
• 23:56   Re: [HACKERS] Recognizing range constraints (was Re: Plan John A Meinel