Mailing lists [pgsql-performance]
- Weird performance differences between cloud vendors Dirk Krautschick
 - Re: Weird performance differences between cloud vendors Laurenz Albe
 - huge SubtransSLRU and SubtransBuffer wait_event James Pang (chaolpan)
 - Re: huge SubtransSLRU and SubtransBuffer wait_event Laurenz Albe
 - Memory growth using many named prepared statements, in spite of using DISCARD ALL afterwards. Daniel Blanch Bataller
 - Re: Memory growth using many named prepared statements, in spite of using DISCARD ALL afterwards. Heikki Linnakangas
 - RE: huge SubtransSLRU and SubtransBuffer wait_event James Pang (chaolpan)
 
- RE: huge SubtransSLRU and SubtransBuffer wait_event James Pang (chaolpan)
 - Re: Memory growth using many named prepared statements, in spite of using DISCARD ALL afterwards. Daniel Blanch Bataller
 - Re: huge SubtransSLRU and SubtransBuffer wait_event Alvaro Herrera
 - Re: huge SubtransSLRU and SubtransBuffer wait_event Lars Aksel Opsahl
 - Re: huge SubtransSLRU and SubtransBuffer wait_event Nikolay Samokhvalov
 - Re: huge SubtransSLRU and SubtransBuffer wait_event Laurenz Albe
 
- RE: huge SubtransSLRU and SubtransBuffer wait_event James Pang (chaolpan)
 
- Simple JOIN on heavy table not using expected index kimaidou
 - Re: Simple JOIN on heavy table not using expected index Burçin Yazıcı
 - Re: Simple JOIN on heavy table not using expected index kimaidou
 - Re: Simple JOIN on heavy table not using expected index Tom Lane
 - Re: Simple JOIN on heavy table not using expected index kimaidou
 
- PostgreSQL doesn't use index-only scan if there is an expression in index Pavel Kulakov
 - Re: PostgreSQL doesn't use index-only scan if there is an expression in index Laurenz Albe
 
- "not related" code blocks for removal of dead rows when using vacuum and this kills the performance Lars Aksel Opsahl
 - Re: "not related" code blocks for removal of dead rows when using vacuum and this kills the performance Laurenz Albe
 - Re: "not related" code blocks for removal of dead rows when using vacuum and this kills the performance Lars Aksel Opsahl
 
- Re: "not related" code blocks for removal of dead rows when using vacuum and this kills the performance Lars Aksel Opsahl
 - Re: "not related" code blocks for removal of dead rows when using vacuum and this kills the performance Laurenz Albe
 - Re: "not related" code blocks for removal of dead rows when using vacuum and this kills the performance Lars Aksel Opsahl
 
- sql statement not using all primary key values and poor performance James Pang
 - Re: sql statement not using all primary key values and poor performance James Pang
 - Re: sql statement not using all primary key values and poor performance Laurenz Albe
 - Re: sql statement not using all primary key values and poor performance James Pang
 - Re: sql statement not using all primary key values and poor performance Laurenz Albe
 
- Optimizing count(), but Explain estimates wildly off Chema
 - Re: Optimizing count(), but Explain estimates wildly off Vitalii Tymchyshyn
 - Re: Optimizing count(), but Explain estimates wildly off Laurenz Albe
 - Re: Optimizing count(), but Explain estimates wildly off Alvaro Herrera
 - extend statistics help reduce index scan a lot of shared buffer hits. James Pang
 - Fwd: extend statistics help reduce index scan a lot of shared buffer hits. James Pang
 
- generic plan generate poor performance James Pang
 - Re: generic plan generate poor performance Pavel Stehule
 - Table Partitioning and Indexes Performance Questions David Kelly
 - Re: Table Partitioning and Indexes Performance Questions Laurenz Albe
 - Re: Table Partitioning and Indexes Performance Questions Anupam b
 - Re: Optimizing count(), but Explain estimates wildly off Chema