Re: Size of Path nodes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Size of Path nodes
Date
Msg-id 11670.1449252454@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Size of Path nodes  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2015-12-04 12:50:09 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> which means Robert has already blown the planner's space consumption out
>> by close to a factor of 2, and I should stop worrying.

> FWIW, for me it's still <= 64 bytes:

No, it's not bare Path I'm worried about, it's IndexPath, which went
from 128 bytes in previous versions to 136 in HEAD.  Likewise for
BitmapHeapPath, TidPath, ForeignPath, AppendPath, ResultPath,
MaterialPath, and possibly others.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Size of Path nodes
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Remaining 9.5 open items