Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> "Andres" == Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Andres> Why is it so much more dangerous? I've seen plenty of corrupted
> Andres> clusters due to people doing DML against the catalogs. I'm OK
> Andres> with adding separate GUCs for both, if we want to do that, but
> Andres> I do think we shouldn't allow updating the catalogs wthout
> Andres> having having the superuser explicitly opt into that.
> Be aware that a nonzero number of extensions (postgis especially) do
> catalog DML in their install or update scripts.
I believe we've done that in some contrib update scripts, as well.
> While you might well
> think they shouldn't do that, in practice there is usually no viable
> alternative.
In principle, if the thing is SUSET, we could have such extension scripts
set it temporarily. But it would be a compatibility hazard -- a script
with such a SET command in it would fail in older branches.
What exactly is the motivation for changing this now, after 20 years?
regards, tom lane
