Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
| From | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | 1330737306-sup-8005@alvh.no-ip.org Whole thread Raw |
| In response to | Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Responses |
Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement |
| List | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of mar feb 28 16:30:58 -0300 2012:
> Hello
>
> Dne 28. února 2012 17:48 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> napsal(a):
> >
> >
> > I have a few comments about this patch:
> >
> > I didn't like the fact that the checker calling infrastructure uses
> > SPI instead of just a FunctionCallN to call the checker function. I
> > think this should be easily avoidable.
>
> It is not possible - or it has not simple solution (I don't how to do
> it). PLpgSQL_checker is SRF function. SPI is used for processing
> returned resultset. I looked to pg source code, and I didn't find any
> other pattern than using SPI for SRF function call. It is probably
> possible, but it means some code duplication too. I invite any ideas.
It wasn't all that difficult -- see below. While at this, I have a
question: how attached you are to the current return format for CHECK
FUNCTION?
check function f1(); CHECK FUNCTION
-------------------------------------------------------------In function: 'f1()'error:42804:5:assignment:subscripted
objectis not an array
(2 rows)
It seems to me that it'd be trivial to make it look like this instead:
check function f1();
function | lineno | statement | sqlstate | message | detail | hint | level | position |
query
---------+--------+------------+----------+------------------------------------+--------+------+-------+----------+-------
f1() | 5 | assignment | 42804 | subscripted object is not an array | | | error | |
(1 row)
This looks much nicer to me.
One thing we lose is the caret marking the position of the error -- but
I'm wondering if that really works well. I didn't test it but from the
code it looks to me like it'd misbehave if you had a multiline statement.
Opinions?
/** Search and execute the checker function.** returns true, when checked function is valid*/
static bool
CheckFunctionById(Oid funcOid, Oid relid, ArrayType *options, bool fatal_errors, TupOutputState *tstate)
{HeapTuple tup;Form_pg_proc proc;HeapTuple languageTuple;Form_pg_language lanForm;Oid
languageChecker;char *funcname;int result;
tup = SearchSysCache1(PROCOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(funcOid));if (!HeapTupleIsValid(tup)) /* should not happen */
elog(ERROR,"cache lookup failed for function %u", funcOid);
proc = (Form_pg_proc) GETSTRUCT(tup);
languageTuple = SearchSysCache1(LANGOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(proc->prolang));Assert(HeapTupleIsValid(languageTuple));
lanForm = (Form_pg_language) GETSTRUCT(languageTuple);languageChecker = lanForm->lanchecker;
funcname = format_procedure(funcOid);
/* We're all set to call the checker */if (OidIsValid(languageChecker)){ TupleDesc tupdesc; Datum
checkret; FmgrInfo flinfo; ReturnSetInfo rsinfo; FunctionCallInfoData fcinfo;
/* create the tuple descriptor that the checker is supposed to return */ tupdesc = CreateTemplateTupleDesc(10,
false); TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 1, "functionid", REGPROCOID, -1, 0); TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc,
(AttrNumber)2, "lineno", INT4OID, -1, 0); TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 3, "statement", TEXTOID, -1, 0);
TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 4, "sqlstate", TEXTOID, -1, 0); TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber)
5,"message", TEXTOID, -1, 0); TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 6, "detail", TEXTOID, -1, 0);
TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc,(AttrNumber) 7, "hint", TEXTOID, -1, 0); TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 8,
"level",TEXTOID, -1, 0); TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 9, "position", INT4OID, -1, 0);
TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc,(AttrNumber) 10, "query", TEXTOID, -1, 0); fmgr_info(languageChecker, &flinfo);
rsinfo.type = T_ReturnSetInfo; rsinfo.econtext = CreateStandaloneExprContext(); rsinfo.expectedDesc =
tupdesc; rsinfo.allowedModes = (int) SFRM_Materialize; /* returnMode is set by the checker, hopefully ... */ /*
isDoneis not relevant, since not using ValuePerCall */ rsinfo.setResult = NULL; rsinfo.setDesc = NULL;
InitFunctionCallInfoData(fcinfo, &flinfo, 4, InvalidOid, NULL, (Node *) &rsinfo); fcinfo.arg[0] =
ObjectIdGetDatum(funcOid); fcinfo.arg[1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(relid); fcinfo.arg[2] = PointerGetDatum(options);
fcinfo.arg[3]= BoolGetDatum(fatal_errors); fcinfo.argnull[0] = false; fcinfo.argnull[1] = false;
fcinfo.argnull[2]= false; fcinfo.argnull[3] = false;
checkret = FunctionCallInvoke(&fcinfo);
if (rsinfo.returnMode != SFRM_Materialize) elog(ERROR, "checker function didn't return a proper return
set"); /* XXX we have to do some checking on rsinfo.isDone and checkret here */
if (rsinfo.setResult != NULL) { bool isnull; StringInfoData str; TupleTableSlot
*slot= MakeSingleTupleTableSlot(tupdesc);
initStringInfo(&str);
while (tuplestore_gettupleslot(rsinfo.setResult, true, false, slot)) { text *message = (text
*)DatumGetPointer(slot_getattr(slot, 5, &isnull));
resetStringInfo(&str);
appendStringInfo(&str, "got a message: %s", text_to_cstring(message));
do_text_output_oneline(tstate,str.data); }
pfree(str.data); ExecDropSingleTupleTableSlot(slot); }}
pfree(funcname);
ReleaseSysCache(languageTuple);ReleaseSysCache(tup);
return result;
}
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
pgsql-hackers by date: