Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date
Msg-id 1342154.1752090150@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER  (Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
List pgsql-hackers
Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2025 at 12:07 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'm confused about why this moves up the temporary changes of
>> CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS, but not LIBS?  Maybe that's actually correct,
>> but it looks strange (and perhaps deserves a comment about why).

> Does the attached help clarify?

Yes, thanks.

> (Upthread, I was idly wondering if those AC_CHECKs should just be
> removed -- after all, PKG_CHECK_MODULES just told us where Curl was --
> but I'm nervous that this might make more niche use cases like
> cross-compilation harder to use in practice?)

Nah, let's keep them.  We do document for at least some libraries
how to manually specify the include and link options without
depending on pkg-config.  If someone tries that with libcurl,
it'd be good to have sanity checks on the results.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding basic NUMA awareness
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: TransactionIdIsActive() has long been unused