Re: jsonb and nested hstore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: jsonb and nested hstore
Date
Msg-id 15394.1394039956@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jsonb and nested hstore  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: jsonb and nested hstore
List pgsql-hackers
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> While there's certainly much to be said for the idea that jsonb should be
>> an extension, I don't think we have the technology to package it as a
>> *separate* extension; it'd have to be included in the hstore extension.

> I disagree with that.  The shared C bits can live inside the core
> system and the SQL level hooks and extension specific behaviors could
> live in an extension.

That approach abandons every bit of value in an extension, no?
You certainly don't get to fix bugs outside a core-system release cycle.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel pg_dump causes assertion failure in HEAD
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonb and nested hstore